Today was Pulpit Freedom Sunday, and I took the liberty just to preach the next text in line.
I didn’t feel the least bit hindered by the IRS to stand up and say what Jesus said. And I didn’t see the need to say anything else. In fact, I think I have a mandate not to say anything else.
Which brings me to my point: What’s the big deal? Why are we upset that the government agrees with Jesus? I realize that we should sometimes disagree with the government just on the principle of the matter.
Stephen Colbert had a segment on it including a short interview with one of the people behind this issue, Jim Garlow, the pastor of Skyline Wesleyan Church in San Diego.
Colbert, in his mocking sort of way, points out an inherent problem: If you endorse a candidate in God’s name, if that candidate turns out to be corrupt, you’ve got a false god.
While not entirely true, it is a point worthy of consideration.
Why would any pastor want to tie the message of the gospel and Jesus to politics? What happens when God tells us to vote for someone and that someone turns out to be corrupt?
Would it not be better just to preach the word? After all, we have a mandate for that.
And God won’t turn up on the evening news for taking bribes.
1 comment:
"Would it not be better just to preach the word? After all, we have a mandate for that."
Exactly!
Post a Comment