Friday, February 22, 2013

Around the Horn

Leading off with a solid single, Pastors.com gives eight ways to engage the culture. It’s easier than you think. In fact, it’s a lot of what thoughtful Christians are already doing, and have been for years. They just didn’t know it was called “engaging the culture.” So keep at it. And call it whatever you want.

At second, Roger Olson gives his perspective on fundamentalists and fundamentalism. He is an outsider, and not a sympathetic one. This is a follow up to his article about why he is not a liberal Christian. One value of an article like this is that it shows just how broad fundamentalism is to outsiders. And it shows just how useless the term can be around some.

At third, here’s a good short piece about word studies. Word studies make legitimate contributions to the study of the Bible, but only when done legitimately. Take heed to this.

The home run today is erstwhile celebrity-(don’t)-wanna-be Carl Trueman talking about Tim Tebow and the world we live in. It’s worth a read, if for no other reason than to see Trueman invoke a “homicidal foot fetishist” in the cause of cultural transformation. I had no idea they existed. In fact, I am not even sure I know what one is. And that is probably a good thing. But I sense Trueman is not praising them, whoever they may be.

It’s also worth a mention that spring training is is full swing, which means that Cleveland is officially out of the pennant race.

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Lizards on the Loose

I know most of you don’t like golf (sanctification is progressive though), and probably fewer of you like lizards (though I hear a little ketchup and some green peppers and onions help them go down okay).

But go here, push play, and watch the background.

Church Works Media

Many of you might be familiar with Church Works Media.

Even if you don’t know the name “Church Works Media” you might have heard hymns like “His Robes For Mine” or “My Jesus Fair.” Or you might have heard of the “Gospel Meditations” booklets (for Women, Men, and Missions, and some to come I think).

All of these (plus more) are part of the excellent ministry resource known as “Church Works Media,” headed up by my friend, Chris Anderson along with Joe Tyrpak.

Starting this week, the site has been redesigned and relaunched with some new features, including a team blog. This blog will include some excellent writers and thinkers, along with me. I promise to write. Others will no doubt cover the excellence and the thinking.

I encourage you to check out CWM and add it to your blog reader.

If you haven’t yet, incorporate some of these songs into your repertoire. You can download PDFs of the songs for free. Octavos are available for your choir. A new CD has just been released for purchase and soon will be available on ITunes I think.

Check it out, and pass the word along to some friends.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Three Shaping Factors in Sermons

Pastors, as we approach our weekly sermon preparation, let me suggest three factors that should shape every message.

First, the text itself should shape the message. The text sets boundaries for a message. A biblical message always accurately explains the text, and is limited by the text. The text draws boundaries around the possible sermon subject and themes. If you don’t know what the text says, and what it means, then you aren’t ready to move on yet.

Second, the “big idea” should shape the message. Any given text only has one meaning. But it may have multiple implications, and almost unlimited applications. We should recognize that we cannot say everything that could be said about a text in a single message (or at least should not say everything that can be said, though I have heard a few attempts, and probably committed that sin a time or two). It is necessary to single out a theme and a big idea, and then preach that. That means some things are going to be left unsaid, at least for now. We must be willing to leave some stuff on “the cutting room floor.” On the upside, it may mean that you can use the same text and the same exegetical work next week to preach a different theme and a different big idea. For instance, a message on Exodus 3 might focus on the faithfulness of God in his character. It might focus more on the response of people to the faithfulness of God. It might focus on God’s sovereign control over history. A single message should not focus on all three, however. Focus on one idea. Save something for later. As Bryan Chapell says, “How many things is a message about? One thing.” As Larry Rogier says, “I am going to be here next week anyway, so I will preach that then.” (Only one of those sayings is worth writing a book about though.)

Third, the audience should shape the message. In the course of preparation, you need to imagine the audience that will be sitting in front you. That’s right, the actual audience. See faces. See couples. See families. See enemies. See guests. See people you saw in the coffee shop, the park, or the diner who might show up. Think of conversations you have had. Think of conversations you need to have. Think of conversations you would like to have. Think of the questions they would ask. Think of the things that would cause them to crease their brow and cock their head to one side. Think of the things that would cause them to say, “No way.” Anticipate their unbelief, and then address it. As a general rule, I am thinking in terms of preaching to “just below the midline.” I am not trying to impress the most knowledgeable, though I might have something in there for them. I am not trying to impress the least knowledgeable, though I want to be clear. I am trying to preach to the majority of people. That means I am going to assume a mid-line of maturity and understanding, and then stay around there or just to the simpler side of it. If you do that, you will probably find (as I have found) the greatest impact.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

My Favorite Reagan Joke

Ronald Reagan was a great story teller and jokester. Here’s a good sample.

One of my favorites begins at about 4:53 where he tells the story of a Russian commissar who went to a collective farm to check on the crops.

It’s worth a listen if you having a bit of a slow afternoon. Or even if you’re not.